Ways to go deeper with this site:
It applies style heuristics to crawled text, including repeated generic phrases, sentence-length uniformity, vocabulary diversity, passive-voice patterns, and word repetition. These signals occur in both human and machine-written text.
No. The 0–100 style score is a review heuristic, not an authorship probability or proof. Use flagged pages to prioritize editorial review, never to make an authorship accusation.
Check clarity, specificity, factual support, original insight, examples, sourcing, brand voice, and usefulness for the intended reader. Rewrite weak passages because they need improvement, not solely because a style heuristic flagged them.
Yes. A guest can try an initial scan, and Free accounts include 5 scans per month. Crawl depth and scan time vary with the site, scan type, and plan.
The checker looks for a maintained list of formulaic expressions and reports repeated matches with the affected pages. A matched phrase is an editorial signal only; context determines whether the wording is appropriate.
No. The checker does not measure rankings, search demand, accuracy, originality, expertise, or reader satisfaction. Treat it as one writing-quality input alongside fact-checking, plagiarism review, subject-matter expertise, and audience feedback.
Readability
Calculate approximate English-language Flesch metrics, word counts, sentence lengths, and reading-time estimates from captured page text
Content Gaps
Review page coverage, metadata, headings, links, and format opportunities
Blog Ideas
Generate blog-topic starting points from crawled website content
Duplicate Content
Find repeated metadata and page pairs with high crawl-text overlap