// Agent category
Accessibility, mobile usability, landing pages, forms, heatmaps, and social previews
Find implementation and content signals that deserve closer UX review. These tools inspect mobile-related markup, automated accessibility rules, landing-page content, form and popup indicators, static-layout patterns, and social metadata. They do not observe visitors, render every responsive state, produce real heatmaps, or establish accessibility conformance; confirm findings with device testing, assistive technology, analytics, and user research.
7 agents
Automated accessibility checks with WCAG-mapped findings and manual-test guidance
Review crawl-captured text, markup cues, image records, links, headings, and fetch timing for mobile follow-up
Review crawl-visible headings, action wording, metadata, and media
Generate static-layout hypotheses without observed behavior data
Find public pages with form, field, privacy, and submit wording
Review crawl-visible email signup, popup, offer, and trust wording
Measure captured Open Graph and X/Twitter field coverage across crawled pages
It uses crawled HTML to check viewport configuration and infer possible issues from inline sizing, small-font links, adjacent links, navigation patterns, media markup, content length, forms, and crawl timing. It does not render pages at device breakpoints or measure physical touch targets.
No. It reports automated, WCAG-mapped findings such as missing text alternatives, heading and landmark issues, form-label problems, and accessible-name gaps. Contrast, full keyboard flows, screen-reader behavior, visual states, and many cognitive barriers require rendered or manual testing.
No. Enter a public URL and review results in your browser. Use the findings as a triage list, then test key tasks on representative devices and with the assistive technologies used by your audience.