// Five guest checks · no account for the first check
Check one public page's AI-search readiness: whether AI crawlers are allowed, an llms.txt file, citable structured data, and answerable content. A readiness checklist — not a measured citation rate.
> Target_URL
5 free checks · No signup · Free
Read robots.txt for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and more.
Check for the emerging llms.txt file at the site root (optional, not a defect).
Detect JSON-LD types an assistant can attribute to your brand.
Review title, description, headings and FAQ structure for answerability.
Ways to go deeper with this site:
It fetches one public page plus the site's robots.txt and llms.txt, then reviews on-page AI-search readiness signals: whether major AI crawlers are allowed, whether citable structured data (JSON-LD) is present, whether the content is structured to be answerable, and whether an llms.txt file exists.
No. This is a readiness checklist of on-page signals, not a measured citation rate. It does not query ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or Google AI Overviews. Confirm real citations by searching for your brand inside those assistants.
It checks robots.txt for GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, CCBot, meta-externalagent, and Amazonbot. Being allowed is the readiness-positive state.
No. llms.txt is an emerging, optional standard. Its absence is reported for information only and is not treated as a defect.
It reads static server-returned HTML and root-level robots.txt only; it does not render JavaScript, evaluate per-path crawl rules, or verify actual AI citations or traffic.
Guests can run five quick-tool checks. A free account includes 15 quick-tool checks per month, while Pro and Agency plans include unlimited quick-tool use under the current plan limits.
GEO Signals
Review crawl-visible content and technical signals across eight internal rule groups
JSON-LD Review
Review crawl-captured static JSON-LD types, selected field checks, and pages chosen by a limited applicability heuristic
Writing Patterns
Flag formulaic style patterns for human editorial review
Answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Gemini read the open web through named crawlers, then attribute answers back to sources they can parse. This tool reviews the on-page signals that make a page eligible to be read and cited: whether robots.txt allows those AI crawlers, whether citable application/ld+json structured data is present, whether the content is structured to answer questions, and whether an emerging llms.txt file exists.
Readiness is a checklist of on-page signals, not a measured citation rate. This request does not query any AI assistant, does not render JavaScript, and evaluates robots.txt at the root path only. It cannot tell you whether an assistant currently cites you — confirm that by searching for your brand inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI Overviews.
Unblock the AI crawlers you want to allow in robots.txt, add or complete structured data (Organization, Article, FAQPage) that assistants can attribute, and structure content with clear headings and direct answers. For a coordinated pass across schema, content coverage, and brand signals, run the AI Search Visibility workflow.